Team
Assessment of Your Institution’s Evidence of Learning-Centeredness
|
Characteristics |
Little or No Evidence |
Emerging |
Exemplary |
Major Indicators |
Institution and its programs
articulate high and clear expectations for student learning and development. |
|
|
|
|
|
Institution values and recognizes an ongoing, sustainable commitment to assessing student learning and development and the use of these data to improve educational quality. |
|
|
|
|
|
Institution develops and supports channels of communication to discuss and act on results of assessing student learning and development. |
|
|
|
|
|
Representatives across the institution are involved in sustainable, ongoing, and systematic inquiry into what and how well students learn and develop; and they use the results of this inquiry to validate or improve student learning. |
|
|
|
|
Faculty, student affairs
professionals, and staff work in partnership to support student learning. |
|
|
|
|
|
Faculty, student affairs professionals, and staff explore how pedagogy and learning experiences contribute to diverse learners and learning styles. |
|
|
|
|
|
Faculty within programs/disciplines develop consensus about desired learning outcomes, as well as spend time discussing how students develop those desired outcomes over time. |
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative leaders support inquiry into student learning inside and outside of the classroom and support/advocate for allocation of resources to improve student learning. |
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional planning, budgeting and decision making are linked to assessment findings in order to improve educational quality. |
|
|
|
|
|
Students are actively engaged in their learning and in the assessment of their learning. |
|
|
|
|
|
Board regularly seeks information about student learning and allocates resources based on assessment findings. |
|
|
|
|